Saber Sharifi; Maryam Seifnaraghi; Ezatollah Naderi; Ghodsi Ahghar
Volume 12, Special Issue , June 2018, , Pages 249-266
Abstract
Abstract The purpose of this article is to investigate the predictive point of view in the upstream documents of Iranian education. For this purpose, in this research, which is a kind of evaluation study, content analysis is used and the descriptive method is used because of the fact that the researcher ...
Read More
Abstract The purpose of this article is to investigate the predictive point of view in the upstream documents of Iranian education. For this purpose, in this research, which is a kind of evaluation study, content analysis is used and the descriptive method is used because of the fact that the researcher personally studies and searches criteria and indexes. In the first research, Literature and subject background, the components of critical thinking were identified from the viewpoint of various theorists and researchers. In this section, Bloom's revised classification was used as the dominant theory, and its last three categories, analysis, evaluation and composition (Creation) was selected as a joint component for review. Validity of selected components was confirmed by three field specialists. The reliability coefficient, which was performed with a re-test method, is 96% in this research. Among the research community, the national curriculum document was selected as a sample by purposeful sampling. The results of the research show that, in general, the text and content The national curriculum document does not pay the same attention to the critical thinking components and the emphasis on the composition component (creation) is higher by 43% than the other components, and the component of evaluation is second to 38% and the analysis component with 19% Third grade is the focus and emphasis.
